Requiem: The Colorado Daily Oozes Into History
The story didn't even merit the front page.
"Colorado Daily to Move Into Camera's Building," read the headline in the April 24 Daily Camera. Prairie Mountain Publishing, which owns both papers, is selling off the Daily's building on east Pearl street and consolidating both staffs into the Camera building at 11th and Pearl streets.
Camera Publisher Al Manzi says that the move "allows us to realize some operation synergies that were not possible in their current location." Which means that the parent company will make some money off the real estate and that the Daily staff will take up a few of the many empty desks left in the Camera building.
The story followed by only two weeks the departure of Camera Editorial Page Editor Clint Talbott, who left for a position in the publications department at CU. This was a particularly rich irony, as anybody who has read local newspapers the last couple of decades well knows. Talbott had kept CU on his editorial hot seat during that time, roughly half with the Daily and half with the Camera, for the institution's haughty lack of transparency and basic fiscal irresponsibility, especially in the athletic department.
But I'm guessing that more just this reader laughed out loud remembering the days when Talbott was editor of the Daily and we had such fun mocking the Camera as Brand X Newspaper. The Daily's dissolution and Talbott's departure are significant, like tacking a big -30- at the end of the story of a distinct period of newspapering in Boulder.
More than a century old and for many decades the official campus newspaper, the Daily kept its offices on campus but split from CU under the leadership of Tim Lange beginning, I think, around 1971, and he led the paper, more or less, until he left Boulder for Los Angeles in 1985. The Daily didn't make a dime, but under Lange, it was an offbeat, gleefully pro-Sandinista, anti-Reagan newspaper. That era would be a great tale in itself.
The period of which I speak began in the 1980s and ended with the current decline in newsprint readership and revenues as newspapers migrate to the Internet. It was a spurt of growth responsible for USA Today and color weather pages and free-standing sections for business and celebrity gossip into your daily newspaper.
Boulder in the early 1980s was a two-newspaper town. The Camera was a powerhouse, profitable and bursting with staff writers. The features section was heavy with critics in full-time positions, the sports section the envy of every other small paper in the state. There was a Sunday features magazine. The comics pages could be read without magnification.
After Lange's departure in 1986, the Daily was reeling. Audience, its weekly arts and entertainment magazine (which had given me my first local writing gig), had been shuttered, and the Daily itself came dangerously close that summer to closing itself. Publisher Dennis Dube hired Talbott as editor, who in turn hired Paul Danish as layout editor and me as Means & Media editor/news copy editor.
As we assembled the first of many Back-to-School issues, we wondered aloud just what we would be covering and held our breath and waited for the students to return in August. Soon, our reporters were in the middle of student protests that turned violent over CIA recruitment on campus and, as they say, we were off.
Like all papers, the Daily moved into the computer age in the late 1980s. Our city coverage was enough that the sales staff was able to sell the paper as "your campus paper" to Hill businesses and "your alternative to the Camera" to businesses on Pearl Street.
Under Talbott, it was a great time to work at the Daily. We weren't bound by the family-newspaper constrictions of the Camera, revenues grew and we delighted in skewering our much larger competitor two blocks east of us whenever possible.
By the early 1990s the Daily faced more competition for ad dollars, first from the Onion and then the Boulder Weekly. Talbott moved to the Camera's op/ed pages. I didn't always agree with his opinions, but I appreciated his arguments and admired his spare, efficient prose.
The Daily was almost sunk by a felonious employee in the 1990s, but was bought by Randy Miller, who sold it to the Camera's owners last year. This spring it will be dissolved into the bowels of the Camera. Daily editors will claim autonomy, but it just won't be the same.
Perhaps it deserves no more than this, a fond memory on an old journalist's webblog. This is the way an era ends not with a bang but a whimper.
P.S. Here's the view from the Means and Media editor's desk at the Colorado Daily offices at 9th and Pearl streets circa 1990. That's ace reporter Ron Baird on the left and Mike Sandrock in the center (I can still smell Hannah's hummus on his desk).
![]()
Comments
Thanks, Leland,
It was a fun time. That popcorn ceiling brings back memories. That looks a bit like Mike O'Keeffe in the background, too.
Cheers,
Clint
Posted by: Clint Talbott | May 1, 2008 02:36 PM
Thanks for that reprise of recent Daily history. I say "recent" in light of the fact that I and several other Daily denizens from the '50s and the '60s -- now in our 60's and 70's -- are still wobbling around out here and, by coincidence, will be gathering for a reunion next week in Denver to share some really old memories of the time the Daily was actually housed in the UMC.
It's good to know what's happened since.
Bob Cox/Abiquiu, NM
Posted by: Robert Cox | May 1, 2008 06:46 PM
(sigh)
I'm still feeling half empty about the Daily, looking for someone to blame for its fall. Tim Lange and I tried very hard to create a corporate structure for the daily that would enable it to survive into the future by divorcing corporate control from editorial policy, and insulating board elections from petty greed. In the end, it was that very personal greed that brought down the employee stock-ownership program, which laid the seeds for the company's bankruptcy. I'd love to mention three names right here, but on the advice of my attorney I shall only wear a slight smile of wan bitterness.
Side note: Tim Lange actually recruited and hired Clint Talbot, recognizing in a green kid the vast potential that Clint has shown over the years. But don't let it go to your head, Clint. You're still just a kid!
People I miss: Tim, Susan Vogle, VA Ostrander, Mike O'Keefe, Liz Horton, Leland Rucker (thanks for this snag, leland), S.K Levin, many others.
Finally, a word about Randy Miller. Under his publishership, the Daily gained ground in content and revenue, but lost its soul. Under the guise of "objective" journalism, it became just another investment, something to be sold at a profit when the time was right. Our news world is now filled with this same ethic -- get the story, whatever it is, play it for its crudest angle, make the headline bigger, and shout it out so loudly that no other voices can be heard.
(sigh)
Just another gumbling gripe from an old fart.
dennis dube
(footnote) The Daily offered me 10 cents a share for my stock before the bankruptcy. But I gambled that they were so incompotent that they would probably go out of business with money in the bank.
It's the only bet I ever won!
Posted by: dennis dube | May 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Just for the record: At least until I left in February 1986, and I suspect well beyond, the Colorado Daily was not pro-Sandinista. Being against the Reagan administration's support of the terrorist contras did not mean unqualified support for Danny Ortega and the rest of comandantes. They had a chance - with much citizen support - and they blew it by failing to divorce themselves from rigid Marxism-Leninism, the bane of every person who would like to see democratic socialism in place of the monstrous economic system now dominating most of the world.
As for what ultimately has happened to the Daily, as Dennis writes, it lost its soul once it became nothing more than a profit point. Given the horrific state of 99% of American "journalism" - a journalism that couldn't even be bothered to tell Americans that they were being fed a pack of lies about Iraq - I've yet to decide whether I am gleeful or just indifferent that practically every newspaper in the country is losing circulation.
Posted by: Timothy Lange | May 2, 2008 03:31 PM
If the Camera wants to be relevant again, they should bring back the "Ask Dr. Rock" column.
Posted by: Bobby Heenan | May 6, 2008 10:40 PM